2026 Healthcare Cost Hikes, IRS Mileage Rates, and Workplace AI Risks

Healthcare benefit costs are surging in 2026—how can employers adapt? The IRS made a rare mid-year adjustment to standard mileage rates—what are the key details? When employees start turning in AI-generated work they don’t even understand themselves, what warning signs should managers look out for? This report delivers a comprehensive evaluation.

2026 Healthcare Benefit Costs Are Surging: How Should Employers Respond?

First, let’s look at the latest trends in healthcare benefit costs. According to the 2026 Global Benefits Forecast Report (opens in new tab), 64% of global companies have listed cost control as their top priority, with nearly half viewing managing benefit costs as their greatest operational challenge. Among these expenses, healthcare benefit costs are surging by up to 10%, far outpacing general inflation.

Despite these rising costs, most employers do not plan to pass the burden onto their employees. In North America, only 2% of employers are considering cutting benefits. Instead, 40% are focusing on optimizing their benefits packages, while 36% are automating administrative processes to reduce hidden management costs. To navigate these pressures, expert Daniel Drolet suggests that employers adjust their benefit policies based on actual employee utilization data, or re-evaluate and switch insurance providers.

Today, more and more companies are focusing on the actual experience employees have with their healthcare benefits. Balancing effective cost control with improving employee wellness has become a top priority for corporate management.

To address this trend, KCAL Insurance Agency is partnering with Kaiser Permanente to host the Executive Healthcare Management Forum for Business Owners. Join us at the Ontario Medical Center to take a deep dive into the Integrated Care Model. This approach enables employees to receive care, lab work, and prescriptions all within a single system—boosting efficiency while helping businesses turn healthcare benefits from an expense into a powerful tool for attracting talent. Business owners and managers are welcome to click here to register for free (opens in new tab).

What Specific Changes Come with the Rare Mid-Year IRS Mileage Rate Increase?

Next, let’s look at the latest updates on IRS mileage rates. On July 13, 2026, the IRS issued a rare mid-year mileage rate increase, with the new rates taking effect retroactively from July 1, 2026, through December 31, 2026. The primary driver behind this adjustment is the recent and persistent rise in gas prices.

Under this update, standard rates for most driving categories have increased by 3.5 cents per mile, with only charitable driving remaining unchanged. The updated rates are as follows: 76 cents per mile for business travel; 23.5 cents per mile for medical purposes, as well as moving expenses for eligible active-duty Armed Forces and intelligence community personnel; and 14 cents per mile for charitable organization service. These rates apply to gas-powered, electric, and hybrid vehicles alike.

California employers are required to fully reimburse employees for all necessary vehicle expenses incurred in the discharge of their duties. The California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE) considers using the standard IRS mileage rate generally sufficient to satisfy this legal obligation. However, employees reserve the right to opt for reimbursement based on their actual vehicle expenses.

Additionally, employers should update their expense reimbursement policies and audit employee travel reimbursements processed in early July to determine if any adjustments are needed, ensuring prompt payment of any retroactive differences to avoid compliance risks.

What Risks Should Managers Watch for When Employees Submit Unvetted AI Content?

Finally, let’s look at the latest research on workplace AI usage. A recent report by AI company Glean reveals that digital workers now spend nearly a full workday each week double-checking AI-related outputs. Prolonged, repetitive validation tasks can easily cause employee burnout, ultimately leading to the phenomenon known as “botshitting”—where employees submit unverified AI outputs that they cannot fully explain or substantiate. Nearly 70% of AI users admit to engaging in this behavior, with higher rates observed among heavy AI users, Gen Z employees, men, and managers.

The report defines this state as a gradual loss of critical thinking and agency among employees. Data shows that 28% of casual AI users blame AI tools for their work errors—a number that surges to 41% among heavy users.

Over-reliance on AI also escalates turnover risks: employees who spend over 40% of their weekly work hours verifying AI content are 73% more likely to actively seek new job opportunities compared to their peers.

Furthermore, 90% of HR professionals routinely use AI, mostly for low-risk tasks like copywriting and administrative work. However, roughly one-third of respondents indicated that AI has begun influencing hiring decisions. Currently, HR software provider Workday faces a discrimination lawsuit over its AI recruitment screening, where plaintiffs allege the system automatically disqualified candidates based on protected characteristics like age and race—serving as a stark warning for businesses.

Glean recommends that companies abandon the “token-maximization” strategy and instead define clear boundaries and standards for AI usage while establishing mechanisms that encourage independent judgment.

KCAL HR Weekly: Brings you the latest insights on U.S. business operations and talent management. All in just five minutes.

This article is intended for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal, tax, or accounting advice. Readers are encouraged to seek professional guidance for advice tailored to their specific circumstances. Click here to schedule a complimentary corporate legal consultation.